“The world is not yet ready for DeepNude,” the team, based in Estonia, said on Thursday. Instead of trying to bring it back online, the developers decided to pull the plug on completely, kill off distribution of the code, and hope the scandal just goes away. Shortly after that message, they changed their tune. We will be back online soon in a few days. We are working to make DeepNude stable and working. We need to fix some bugs and catch our breath. Why? Because we did not expect these visits and our servers need reinforcement. The team initially said on Thursday they were trying to fix bugs, and expected everything to be up and running again in a few days: There was so much interest in this misogynistic piece of crap that the site’s servers couldn’t handle the traffic and crashed, it is claimed. These bogus nudes are perfect for distributing around the 'net to humiliate victims. What do you think would happen when you train a neural network to, in mere seconds, create fake naked images of women – and chiefly women, it doesn't work properly on men – and release it for the world's weirdos to use?īasement dwellers and trolls could feed it snaps of celebrities, colleagues, ex-girlfriends, and anyone else who takes their fancy, and have the software guess, somewhat badly, what they look like underneath their clothes, keeping their faces intact. The shamefaced creators of the $50 Windows and Linux desktop app DeepNude claimed they were overwhelmed by demand from internet creeps: the developers' servers apparently buckled under a stampede of downloads, their buggy software generated more crash reports than they could deal with, and this all came amid a firestorm of social media outrage.Ĭolor us shocked. Security officials in the US have pioneered the use of the scanners at New York and Los Angeles airports and they are gradually being introduced at other airports in the country.A machine-learning-powered perv super-tool that automagically removed clothes from women in photos to make them appear naked has been torn offline by its makers. The Department for Transport will decide whether to install them permanently at the end of the trial, which is expected to last for a year.Įlectromagnetic waves are beamed on to passengers while they stand in a booth, and a virtual three-dimensional "naked" image is created from the reflected energy. The scanners, made by the firm RapiScan Systems at a cost of £80,000 each, were trialled at Heathrow airport in 2004. "Passengers can go through this machine 5,000 times a year each without worrying, it is super safe and the amount of radiation transmitted is tiny," she said. Frequent flyers will not be at risk from the low-level radiation, which is 20,000 times less powerful than a dental x-ray, Barrett said. The images are not erotic or pornographic and they cannot be stored or captured in any way," she said.Īs passengers will not have to remove their coats, shoes or belts, the scanner will – in theory – speed up the check-in process. This scanner completely takes away the hassle of needing to undress. "Most of our customers do not like the traditional 'pat down' search, they find it too intrusive, but they still want to be kept safe. The scan's black and white image will be seen by one officer in a remote location before it is deleted, said Sarah Barrett, head of customer experience at the airport. Travellers can refuse to undergo the virtual strip at Terminal 2 and choose a traditional "pat down" search instead, according to the airport, which admits that some travellers may feel uncomfortable about using the new technology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |